Principles Of A Methodist Farther Explained
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-principles-of-a-methodist-farther-explained-022 |
| Words | 398 |
4. With regard to the consequences of my teaching this doctrine, I
doaire aoj who will not account it lost labour, to consult with his own
ejeSy seriously and in the fear of God, the Third and Fourth Journals.
Attd if he pleases, he may farther read over and compare, from the 279th
to the 381st page of mv answer ; with your reply, from the one himdred
and first iiiclu8ive« to ue one hundred and fourth page.
Among the consequences you reckoned, (in your Remarks,) besides,
** introducing predestination, confusion, presumption, and despair, many
very shocking instances of all which" (your words are) " you give us
among your followers." (pp. 52, 55.) I answered, "You should have
specified a few of those instances, at least the pages where they occur.
(Suppose, only three of each sort, out of any or all the Four Journals.)
Till this is done, I can look upon this assertion as no other than a
flourish of your pen."
Upon this you exclaim : (p. Ill :) "I must beg the reader to observe your method of citing my words. Many instances of omissions
he has had already. But here is such a one, as I bcUeve few contro>
vcrsies can parallel. Would not any one imagine from the view of these
words, [predestination, confusion, presumption, and despair,] that they
occurred all together in page fif\y-two, of my Remarhi, and that I observed nothing farther concerning this point 1 Could it be thought that
any thing intervened between the page referred to, and the last sentence?
And yet so it is, that near three pages intervene !' Ha ! do near three
pages intervene ! Prodigious indeed ! ** And this is called an answer!"
So it is, for want of a better.
" Your business was to show, that the Calvinistical notions have not
prevailed among the Methodists, or that they were no consequences of
unconditional justification." No, sir, it was not my business to show
this. It was not my business to prove the negative ; but yours, to prove
the afRrmativc. Mr. Whitefield is himself a Calvinist Such therefore
doubtless are many of his followers. But Calvinism has not prevailed
at all among any other of the Methodists, (so called,) nor is it to this
day any consequence of unconditional justification, in the maimer wherein
I preach it. '